>By her argument, a free society should be equally obligated to someone unlucky enough to be born in Congo, and should afford her all the same freedoms to live,

>By her argument, a free society should be equally obligated to someone unlucky enough to be born in Congo, and should afford her all the same freedoms to live, work and participate in a well functioning free society. Where did she say that society should treat its obligations towards non-members as equal to the ones it has towards members? I can't find it. >I personally don't support an open borders policy, but that's because I don't subscribe to her philosophy of morality. I don't see how her philosophy of morality does either. This seems somewhat strawmannish.