4 ms·
Still worse, ignoring that philosophy has _always_ proceeded as a statement of theories to be questioned and improved upon. The scholarship is just bad. The w
by yyrrll 8y ago
Still worse, ignoring that philosophy has _always_ proceeded as a statement of theories to be questioned and improved upon.
The scholarship is just bad. The whole argument is full of mis-statements of critiqued positions.
Anyone interested in the article is better served to start reading Plato, Locke, Hume, Smith . . . .