4 ms·

Has anyone read the full article? It's writing clearly that the couple made consent on false given information, as they thought it was a type of vaccination. Th

• buboard 8y ago
  The documents of his study were published on his website , can still be found in archive: Informed consent: https://web.archive.org/web/20181128061149/http://www.sustc-genome.org.cn/source/pdf/Informed-consent-women-English.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20181128061149/http://www.sustc-... Second informed consent; https://web.archive.org/web/20181128061153/http://www.sustc-genome.org.cn/source/pdf/Second-informed-consent-English.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20181128061153/http://www.sustc-... Ethical approval: https://web.archive.org/web/20181128061204/http://www.sustc-genome.org.cn/source/pdf/HarmoniCare-Ethics-English.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20181128061204/http://www.sustc-... Clinical registry: https://web.archive.org/web/20181128061216/http://www.sustc-genome.org.cn/source/pdf/CCR5-Clinical-Trial-Registry-Chinese%20-%20English.pdf https://web.archive.org/web/20181128061216/http://www.sustc-... There is also some info including an excel file with the outcomes of the trial here: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=32758 http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=32758