3 ms·
That assumption was not at all obvious, if you want to talk about imagining facts. To address the argument, it's not fair to assume that recipients of such thr
by huehehue 8y ago
That assumption was not at all obvious, if you want to talk about imagining facts.
To address the argument, it's not fair to assume that recipients of such threats would be either willing or physically able to respond. People with kids will not go around dueling people in the modern era. In my opinion, it's nothing more than a fantasy world. We have a justice system and law enforcement officers. Maybe they don't do a great job, but it should in no way fall to the individual, no matter how zealous they may be.
- anigbrowl 8y agoI'm not suggesting that it should fall to the individual, but that the individual have some latitude to defend themselves against a credible threat rather than being expected to just put up with it and hope for the best.