3 ms·
> act of random vandalism or hooliganism I'm truly not sure if you're insidiously doing this on purpose, but that seems to be an understatement and mischaracte
by darkerside 8y ago
> act of random vandalism or hooliganism
I'm truly not sure if you're insidiously doing this on purpose, but that seems to be an understatement and mischaracterization of what's going on here. These are targeted acts, more akin to civil disobedience than vandalism. The way you phrase it seems like you're trying to plant a seed that distracts from the point.
I try to assume positive intent, but this really seems like a spin job. Could you perhaps elaborate?
- sabalaba 8y agoDefinition of vandalism: willful or malicious destruction or defacement of public or private property. It's vandalism.
- someguydave 8y agoI am not a lawyer but I would think that if the cars are moving in traffic during the criminal act I suspect that the criminals would get a higher charge (criminal endangerment?)
- pdkl95 8y agoNobody disagrees that it is vandalism. The darkerside's comment was clearly referring to the characterization of these incidents as: > act of random vandalism or hooliganism darkerside correctly corrects that: > These are targeted acts That should be obvious to anybody that read the article, which contained several statements form the people involved explaining why they vandalized the cars. Calling it "random" acts of vandalism is an extreme misrepresentation of what happened. The vandalism was done for clearly stated reasons.
- WalterSear 8y agoMore akin to hate crime, really.