3 ms·
Twice in the last year. Our infrastructure is all on UPS, but we decided not to do so for our compute cluster. Additional hardware was deemed a better way to
by phamilton 16y ago
Twice in the last year. Our infrastructure is all on UPS, but we decided not to do so for our compute cluster. Additional hardware was deemed a better way to spend our budget. In the event of an outage, people lose the job that was currently running. All their data is safe. They just need to relaunch the job and they are back in business. Most jobs take just a few days, so it really isn't that big of a deal. Either users wait in a queue for an extra day every time they want to run a job, or once or twice a year they have to resubmit a job that died in a power outage. We chose the latter.
- maukdaddy 16y agoExcellent tradeoff in terms of cost/benefit. More companies should re-evaluate their need for 5 9s and instead look at cases where they can gain efficiencies by doing LESS. Does every single company really need a huge UPS system and backup generators?