3 ms·
> 192:168:1:1 is not a valid IPv6 address Ack, you’re right. For some reason, I was thinking it would get parsed as “192:168::1:1”. That mapping does make sen
by cytzol 8y ago
> 192:168:1:1 is not a valid IPv6 address
Ack, you’re right. For some reason, I was thinking it would get parsed as “192:168::1:1”.
That mapping does make sense.
- loeg 8y ago192:168:1::1 is understandable if you were thinking of "1- or 2-dot" IPv4 addresses (i.e., 192.168.1 => 192.168.0.1, 192.1 => 192.0.0.1), but 192:168::1:1 doesn't really make sense.