3 ms·
You're clearly not willing to address the article itself, instead you're intent on dismissing it for political reasons. And of course it's going to be biased b
by fzeroracer 8y ago
You're clearly not willing to address the article itself, instead you're intent on dismissing it for political reasons.
And of course it's going to be biased because individual experiences are biased. That doesn't make their experience any less interesting or valuable to understand because as it turns out, seeing things from all kinds of different perspectives is important for critical thinking and getting a larger picture.
- postingtoofast 8y agoWould you be so indignant about the article being dismissed if the negative stereotypes it anecdotally verified were focused on man hating social justice cat ladies or equality spouting yuppies who hypocritically abuse undocumented immigrants as cheap nannies and yard workers?
- sonnyblarney 8y agoI don't doubt the author's personal experience. But the piece is inherently political; she uses each personal anecdote to generalize about a group of people, or at least point at that. For every one of her anecdotes, I feel there was definitely 'another side of the story to tell'. But I also don't blame her - as I mentioned, you don't get published without drawing a little bit of blood, which is sadly how it works in a lot of the press these days.