3 ms·
The answer is in the blog comments: >Dear Terry, >Have you ever considered writing a blog post on “Bourgain’s toolbox” summarizing the kinds of techniques use
by southerndrift 8y ago
The answer is in the blog comments:
>Dear Terry,
>Have you ever considered writing a blog post on “Bourgain’s toolbox” summarizing the kinds of techniques used continually (without explanation) in his papers?
>[...]
Tao's final conclusion, besides other hints like http://www.tricki.org/ http://www.tricki.org/ is:
> I think that ultimately the best way to acquire these tools is to constantly be exposed to interesting new mathematics, whether it is through reading a challenging paper from an expert, or listening to a talk on a topic outside your own specialty, or by working (particularly with collaborators) on a problem outside of your own comfort zone. Bourgain is not the only author whose writings happen to be particularly worth investing the effort to properly read; I for instance found reading Szemeredi’s work or Perelman’s work to be a broadly similar experience, and I am sure that there are several other mathematicians with this property also.
- southerndrift 8y agoThough: >Eventually, though, and with the help of Eli Stein and Tom Wolff, I managed to decode the steps which had mystified me – and my impression of the paper reversed completely. If he hasn't managed to do this on his own, how should anybody else acquire those tools just by reading challenging papers?