It's funny because I was just thinking "wow, this is such a great way to do an introduction to the continuum hypothesis". You get the same "introduction" that C

It's funny because I was just thinking "wow, this is such a great way to do an introduction to the continuum hypothesis". You get the same "introduction" that Cantor did: you walk through his early successes and learning that lead to ask these important questions. I remember wishing math was taught this way more generally (especially in grade school), where these results are often just thrown at you as if they came from the sky, whereas, at least for me, they make so much more sense when you first learn about the failures and why we arrived at these ideas. The only time that really stands out to me where this is done is with integrals and doing rectangles and newton's method first. Anyways, all this to say, I clicked the link with the original title and was very happy, but I probably would not click the current link since I wouldn't really know what it means or what to expect.