3 ms·
You assert that there's nothing immoral about weapons development, and go on to almost directly contradict this- noting that "force/battlefield superiority" ten
by maxander 8y ago
You assert that there's nothing immoral about weapons development, and go on to almost directly contradict this- noting that "force/battlefield superiority" tends to lead to the use of these weapons, killing people. I really don't see what your point is; are you trying to argue that an occupation that leads to unnecessary human deaths is moral?
- drharby 8y agoUnnecessary human death is a function of the policy makers. The weapons development is an enabler, but the 'why' behind the use of these weapons is where the moral obligation resides.