4 ms·
To start off that’s ableist. And reeks of privilege (can he afford to live a biking distance to work?) But that doesn’t matter - someone unilaterally changes s
by dovvdkc 8y ago
To start off that’s ableist. And reeks of privilege (can he afford to live a biking distance to work?)
But that doesn’t matter - someone unilaterally changes something and everyone else is supposed to get with the program or find a hole to die in.
- ubercow13 8y agoI don't think its ableist, I wasn't suggesting that there shouldn't be a road for cars, or that they should even bike themselves. I was just wondering if they had considered why they didn't want to use it as that might shed light on why it wasn't a successful bike lane.
- JAlexoid 8y agoLike the motorists changed laws concerning pedestrian traffic and road laws?