I agree my comment doesn't justify my 'speculation'. I apologise and acknowledge that I could have done a better job. I intended to add a word of caution to th

I agree my comment doesn't justify my 'speculation'. I apologise and acknowledge that I could have done a better job. I intended to add a word of caution to the original comment, while completely acknowledging that I may be totally wrong. New account, redirection of the topic while not addressing the specific points of criticism, in conflict with other investigative journalist reports. Here's why I put on a tin foil hat: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/05/19/the-chinese-government-fakes-nearly-450-million-social-media-comments-a-year-this-is-why https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/05/1... FWIW, I'm appreciative of quite a number of 'bold' policies of the Chinese government dared to experiment with and implement. It's just that undisclosed affiliations bother me.