3 ms·
An obvious but still interesting aspect that the talker brings up is that when advertisers start to disclose who is paying for the ad, what we get is a bunch of
by belorn 8y ago
An obvious but still interesting aspect that the talker brings up is that when advertisers start to disclose who is paying for the ad, what we get is a bunch of shell companies.
- dylan604 8y agoNo need to do anything considered nefarious with your actual name when you can hide behind an anonymous shield. If Facebook/YouTube/Whatever require real names, then we should make rules that donations/ad buys/anything election related must come from real names of people, or after Citizens United, an actual recognizable company name. No hiding behind some anonymity shield.
- teddyh 8y agoLook up the term “Strawperson”. Requiring an existing person’s name does nothing.