3 ms·
If you do enough research on drug trafficking, you'll find that the ruling elite pretty much have that market locked up. It can be shown without a doubt that th
by White_N_Nerdy 16y ago
If you do enough research on drug trafficking, you'll find that the ruling elite pretty much have that market locked up. It can be shown without a doubt that the CIA, the Mossad and British intelligence run about 70% of the world's drug supply.
It's a 500 billion dollar a year business. More than oil. Think about it.
- scott_s 16y agoIt can be shown without a doubt that the CIA, the Mossad and British intelligence run about 70% of the world's drug supply. Then show it.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- White_N_Nerdy 16y agoLet me introduce you to google. http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=cia+mossad+intelligence+drugs http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8...
- White_N_Nerdy 16y agoOh and if you want to go with a slightly more tame fact...the estimated value of illegal drugs, go with that. http://www.google.com/search?q=illegal+drug+trade+estimate http://www.google.com/search?q=illegal+drug+trade+estimate Once you're convinced of the estimated value...start using your own logic. The value of the market is absolutely tremendous. If you don't think that the ruling powers that run the governments around the world don't want a piece of that action, you'd better think again.
- scott_s 16y agoSaying "something is so because I can make an argument for it" is not enough. Just because something is possible does not mean it is. And there's still an enormous difference between constructing an argument for something and demonstrating that it is, in fact, possible. So. If you can show it, then show it. If you can't, then don't say you can. Instead say "I have no actual evidence to backup this claim, but my theory is..."
- sliverstorm 16y agoI think he knows that. I think he's just avoiding actually making his argument because nobody can counter his points if we don't know what they are. Also, to White_N_Nerdy, before you go 'look at how much it's worth, they MUST want that and are therefore involved'- consider that the USA GDP is 15 trillion dollars. There's no way our government could control the entire drug trade, which means a fraction of 500 billion is the best they could do, and what's a chunk of 500 billion to the US gov't? Besides, is a chunk of 500 billion actually worth the risk of the ENTIRE WORLD discovering our government is the most evil and corrupt organization ever to walk the earth? (not that they are, but they would be if they were orchestrating the entire drug trade)
- alttab 16y agoOne could argue the US Government still is - but the list of reasons they would provide is long and may not contain any bullet points related to drugs. America is the land of the free (for all). I consider the steady-state employment of government powers at the federal level nothing more than a score board on a death match server.
- White_N_Nerdy 16y agoI said "If you do enough research", which I have. You're asking me to sum up all of the reading that I've done, which I simply am not going to do in order to convince one person. Do it yourself. I'm not here to hold your hand. I'm not making any arguments, I'm telling you what I know for a fact. I gave you some links, you can start there.
- scott_s 16y agoThis is a community where such claims hold no value.