3 ms·
I'm nervous about the source. It has no Wikipedia entry. Its "technical publications" page <http://www.blythinstitute.org/site/sections/11> http://www.blythinst
by gnat 8y ago
I'm nervous about the source. It has no Wikipedia entry. Its "technical publications" page <http://www.blythinstitute.org/site/sections/11> http://www.blythinstitute.org/site/sections/11> includes "Review: Knowledge and Christian Belief" <http://www.blythinstitute.org/images/data/attachments/0000/0068/BartlettReviewOfPlantinga.docx> http://www.blythinstitute.org/images/data/attachments/0000/0... and "Developing an Approach to Non-Physical Cognitive Causation in a Creation Perspective" <http://www.blythinstitute.org/images/data/attachments/0000/0007/non_materialist_cognition_v4.rtf> http://www.blythinstitute.org/images/data/attachments/0000/0.... And they've published "Naturalism and Its Alternatives in Scientific Methodologies
" <http://www.blythinstitute.org/site/sections/66> http://www.blythinstitute.org/site/sections/66>, on a science which accepts supernatural forces (or rather, a science which isn't dependent purely on "naturism" aka "only natural (vs supernatural/spiritual) forces" for explanations).
- yters 8y agoIn that case, you may want to also avoid the works of Newton, Bayes, Pascal, Darwin, and Mendel.