4 ms·
>Perhaps the author has heard of Leibniz's seminal work, Monadology? In this work Leibniz essentially argues that all action and causality in the universe is th
by woodandsteel 8y ago
>Perhaps the author has heard of Leibniz's seminal work, Monadology? In this work Leibniz essentially argues that all action and causality in the universe is the result of God's great plan unfolding, that every action and reaction is predetermined, stored in every fragment of matter and that causality effectively does not exist.
Leibniz's strange philosophy has had no impact at all on science in the West.
> It is simultaneously true that Christians have been scientists, and that Muslims have been, and that both institutions have, at various times both endorsed and indicted the scientific method - and more specifically the idea that natural phenomena are causal without the influence of god.
The author did not deny that. He is talking about the overall trends.
- tomlock 8y ago>Leibniz's strange philosophy has had no impact at all on science in the West. What is this claim based on? His philosophy didn't have an impact on his own science, so perhaps a claim that a belief that God creates a mere appearance of causality, kills science, is a little overblown. >The author did not deny that. He is talking about the overall trends. While hand waving away GDP and other, more obvious indicators.