47 ms·
>have quit them easily. ??? >Why not ask for convincing evidence for those statements instead Because I'm not replying to someone making such a statement.
by learc83 8y ago
>have quit them easily.
???
>Why not ask for convincing evidence for those statements instead
Because I'm not replying to someone making such a statement.
- kodablah 8y ago> ??? Meaning in many cases adverse effects of private sector failure are easier to divorce than public. > Because I'm not replying to someone making such a statement. Right, I was, hence the thread context. The point was wondering why replies aren't there asking, so of course the reply isn't there asking.
- learc83 8y ago>Meaning in many cases adverse effects of private sector failure are easier to divorce than public. Government doesn't tend to provide "easy to divorce services", it's a selection bias problem, not something inherent to public vs privately ran organizations. Of course it's easier to change office supply vendors than it is to change water companies. Utilities tend to be government operated (or heavily regulated) because their nature makes a competitive market difficult. >Right, I was, hence the thread context. Why did you agree with the person you were replying to then? You could have asked for proof in your reply, instead of affirming the comment?