3 ms·
That's an interesting point. However, I am not interested in implementing/engineering cryptography (ever), just having a decent idea of what's going on. Is this
by komali2 8y ago
That's an interesting point. However, I am not interested in implementing/engineering cryptography (ever), just having a decent idea of what's going on. Is this still a failure of the book I should watch out for?
- lvh 8y agoYes! It hasn't gotten better. I wrote Crypto 101 for a reason -- there are a number of problems I have with both the approach, and even if the approach were good, it's horribly outdated now. Serious Cryptography is also good and modern.