I'd be interested in the cite and context of the John Stuart Mill writing you're alluding to. And I wonder if his reasoning applies to the kinds of speech poli

I'd be interested in the cite and context of the John Stuart Mill writing you're alluding to. And I wonder if his reasoning applies to the kinds of speech policing Facebook is doing, or only to the same sorts of things modern US free-speech law makes illegal: direct threats & incitements to imminent violent acts. (Notably not illegal: 'hate speech', blasphemy, insults, abstract advocacy of most crimes, etc.)