Yeah I think for someone more libertarian like you appear to be the argument is more about how bad our system is in terms of costs and outcomes and how good eve

Yeah I think for someone more libertarian like you appear to be the argument is more about how bad our system is in terms of costs and outcomes and how good everyone else’s is. We should look at those other systems and see why they work well. The common factor seems to be a commitment to providing universal coverage. My point is that an argument in economic terms historically has been ineffective for actually getting reform to happen, whereas an argument based on healthcare as a right is effective (I get why it’s not effective for someone like you)