5 ms·

While I don't disagree with much of what you said, your characterization of schedule 1 generally is factually incorrect. There is still testing of schedule 1 su

While I don't disagree with much of what you said, your characterization of schedule 1 generally is factually incorrect. There is still testing of schedule 1 substances; as of 2017 there were more than 590 researchers registered to study schedule 1 substances. Both THC and CBD have been approved for medicinal uses (Marinol and Epidiolex respectively).

titusjohnson 8y ago
Please provide sources. Your statements go directly against common knowledge of what Schedule 1 is.
Nasrudith 8y ago
Yet the whole reason medical marijuana 'broke out' of doctor control in California was the DEA threatening to arrest any doctor who wrote a prescription for it. So it went off of something other than the prescription of a registered doctor undermining their point with their zeal. Schedule 1 substance research has long had far more 'propaganda machine' orientation than science orientation however with the agenda transparently reflected in studies. All of the giving spiders drugs studies to look at their webs while it may have some slight neurological value ignored the bleeding obvious with some examples like the 'caffeine' webs. http://www.learning-mind.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/spiders-on-drugs-web.jpg http://www.learning-mind.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/spid... Of course those webs looked sparse, caffeine is a known neurotoxin to insects! That is why plants produce it in the first place and spiders wouldn't even have much reason to develop a resistance given most species have a carnivorous diet, their prey would have more of a reason to and prey that is dying of neurotoxin would be far less likely to survive to land in their web. Perhaps caffeine's inclusion among the study was a snide point on someone's part about the applicability of spider models to vertebrates. Meanwhile they knew about MDMA use therapeutically yet it took to the 10's to start using it for PTSD again in clinical trials. Sorry lost generations of veterans - there was another war for you to be a casualty of. It is still having politicians try to practice science - and I'm not sure how applicable those two are when they were dragged from them kicking and screaming essentially. It is still a political process instead of a scientific one.

titusjohnson 8y ago

Please provide sources. Your statements go directly against common knowledge of what Schedule 1 is.

Nasrudith 8y ago

Yet the whole reason medical marijuana 'broke out' of doctor control in California was the DEA threatening to arrest any doctor who wrote a prescription for it. So it went off of something other than the prescription of a registered doctor undermining their point with their zeal. Schedule 1 substance research has long had far more 'propaganda machine' orientation than science orientation however with the agenda transparently reflected in studies. All of the giving spiders drugs studies to look at their webs while it may have some slight neurological value ignored the bleeding obvious with some examples like the 'caffeine' webs. http://www.learning-mind.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/spiders-on-drugs-web.jpg http://www.learning-mind.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/spid... Of course those webs looked sparse, caffeine is a known neurotoxin to insects! That is why plants produce it in the first place and spiders wouldn't even have much reason to develop a resistance given most species have a carnivorous diet, their prey would have more of a reason to and prey that is dying of neurotoxin would be far less likely to survive to land in their web. Perhaps caffeine's inclusion among the study was a snide point on someone's part about the applicability of spider models to vertebrates. Meanwhile they knew about MDMA use therapeutically yet it took to the 10's to start using it for PTSD again in clinical trials. Sorry lost generations of veterans - there was another war for you to be a casualty of. It is still having politicians try to practice science - and I'm not sure how applicable those two are when they were dragged from them kicking and screaming essentially. It is still a political process instead of a scientific one.