The photographer (and the rest of us) would have been better served with a simple straightforward take down notice: "a photograph which I own is being used or c

The photographer (and the rest of us) would have been better served with a simple straightforward take down notice: "a photograph which I own is being used or commercial purposes." The clothing brand would have probably contacted the artist, assuming that the band or singer had owned the rights since it went out on the singer's instagram. Upon learning they didn't they would have taken it down or bought the rights. But know we all now what an insufferable prig the photographer is and how unpleasant all parties involved are. If you're gonna be a lawyer, be a lawyer not a morally preening victim.