2 ms·
I like the idea, just also feel 1.21e+24 unique ULIDs per millisecond seems kind of defeated by the millisecond accuracy. This means there are effectively two t
by mehrdadn 8y ago
I like the idea, just also feel 1.21e+24 unique ULIDs per millisecond seems kind of defeated by the millisecond accuracy. This means there are effectively two tolerance values for time at play in the design of this spec that conflict with each other. If we want users to be able to generate ULIDs on such a short timescale (implying it's a realistic use case), then it would seem they should also be able to get comparable accuracy on the timestamp itself.