> Personally, I find the idea that the photographer has more right to a photo than the subject ethically repugnant. I agree, but, I find the band's stance that

> Personally, I find the idea that the photographer has more right to a photo than the subject ethically repugnant. I agree, but, I find the band's stance that the subject's permission is sufficient to also be repugnant. Two artists (subject and photographer) are involved in creating the work. Imho, absent an agreement, consent from both parties should be required to redistribute the photograph.