I don't see why this character assassination was needed - are the facts in question here? Here's a transcript of the interview that the "well known internet har

I don't see why this character assassination was needed - are the facts in question here? Here's a transcript of the interview that the "well known internet harasser" linked: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U0mQjUA0T5INc_GDkwPJ2mfhO7tbaIogisSqqxHw0hc https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U0mQjUA0T5INc_GDkwPJ2mfh... You can clearly see the lines he quotes in it. The words are by Patreon's own Trust and Safety representative: MATT: Are you telling me that this was Patreon’s decision then, or someone pressured you into this? JACQUELINE: No - this was entirely Patreon’s decision. MATT: Well then I don’t understand passing the buck off to somebody else. JACQUELINE: No, I’m not passing the buck off. The thing is we have guidelines, but I’m trying to explain, #1 it is our mission to fund the creative class and obviously some people may not want to be associated. MATT: Well if it’s your mission, then payment processors are irrelevant. It’s your mission. That’s what you’re pursuing. JACQUELINE: We’re not visa and mastercard ourselves - we can’t just make the rules. That’s what I’m saying - there is an extra layer there.