3 ms·
I’ve lived in Chicago, currently in SF. Both cities are filled with homeless like I’ve never seen before. I’d say I felt less safe in Chicago, but in SF the hom
by the_clarence 8y ago
I’ve lived in Chicago, currently in SF. Both cities are filled with homeless like I’ve never seen before. I’d say I felt less safe in Chicago, but in SF the homeless are more trashy: poops and seringes and crazy people everywhere. People get harassed or mugged all the time. It’s not pretty.
Now, tech-wise, SF is freaking amazing and you HAVE to go there for a few years if you work in tech. It’s that magical. If you’re a tourist, I’d say avoid it.
Now if you want my opinion, it’s the US that has a huge disparity problem. SF is just the symptom of something much deeper. People are unwilling to see what’s in front of them. When I talk to people in SF or Chicago they tell me that their city is safe and that it has as much homeless as Paris or London. When I hear about prop C which tries to throw more money at the problem, people seem to be against it.
- redisman 8y agoHomelessness is really a federal problem but it shows its symptoms in big cities since that's where the homeless migrate/are sent. Especially the most "liberal" big cities with good reputations. The state and country end up dumping their problems on a handful of cities and expect them to solve it somehow. SF, LA, NY, SEA can't fix 300M peoples shitty mental health care system and lack of safety net nationally.
- 60654 8y agoHuh, I lived in both as well (in the city itself, not the burbs, in both cases), and had a very different reaction. I haven't felt "unsafe" in either city, but Chicago feels so much nicer and cleaner in comparison. In SF, however, the trashiness you mention is very much right there, front and center. And I haven't seen people be harassed in CHI like I've seen in SF - there's no equivalent of mid-market, with its luxury condos getting built right next to the TL.