3 ms·
It's possible he's randomly generated the docs or something. Which, I agree, is a bit lame. It's nice to get optical confirmation that what you're doing is corr
by retube 16y ago
It's possible he's randomly generated the docs or something. Which, I agree, is a bit lame. It's nice to get optical confirmation that what you're doing is correct, and to get some real insight into language.
Much better would to have been take real sentences from wikipedia.
- bravura 16y agoNo. Grandparent has picked out a few pathological examples out of many good ones. Here is a uniform, random sample of documents: faststretch details honourable judge oriental museum http london wc 1n 3 bg pdsg seminar 1857-8 indian mutiny vera bell katherine r.b rare books collection novy arbat street universitys case The data set is unique terms that occur in a crawl of .uk. Here is how I constructed the data set: I took the UKWAC web-as-corpus crawl (2 billion words, crawled in 2008), ran it through the splitta sentence splitter, removed all funny characters, ran the Penn treebank word tokenizer, and perform term extraction with topia.termextract, discarding terms that will single words. I then lowercased the terms, sorted them, and uniqued them, to give the dataset.