What's weird about private enforcement of censorship is there's no transparency into how a bill becomes a law or an idea at a meeting becomes policy. How exact

What's weird about private enforcement of censorship is there's no transparency into how a bill becomes a law or an idea at a meeting becomes policy. How exactly did they come to their conclusion to censor these people? It was likely a secret trial, with secret evidence, secret witnesses and secret laws that being a confidential meeting between department heads. When we move more governance decisions to the private sector we embed more secrecy and arbitrariness into our governance.