3 ms·
While the article incorrectly conflates being anti-feminist with being against gender equality[1], it’s worth noting that the ban was not for anti-feminist cont
by josteink 8y ago
While the article incorrectly conflates being anti-feminist with being against gender equality[1], it’s worth noting that the ban was not for anti-feminist content, but for other improper speech which may or may not be highly contextual.
But somehow they decided to ban Milo too, making it much less clear what these bans are all about.
Patreon might want to make it clear at this point whether their guidelines are political or not.
[1] I’d rather argue modern day feminist oppose gender equality by constantly promoting special privileges for women. As such being anti-feminist means being pro gender equality.
- wishinghand 8y ago> I’d rather argue modern day feminist oppose gender equality by constantly promoting special privileges for women. As such being anti-feminist means being pro gender equality. Whenever I see this perception, I can't help but think it's due to the tweets and tumblrs of a few extreme voices being passed around as representations of the movement as a whole, especially when posted on various subreddits made to put those sorts of views on blast.