3 ms·
If you've branded yourself as being politically incorrect, isn't this the kind of conflict and publicity you strive to achieve? I'm getting a little tired of p
by mancerayder 8y ago
If you've branded yourself as being politically incorrect, isn't this the kind of conflict and publicity you strive to achieve?
I'm getting a little tired of people who've made a career saying what you "can't say on TV" and then pretending to be surprised when their content gets pulled.
Wait - how do you know what people's intentions are?
Your entire comment is premised on the idea that 'people who've made a career' - as in "all of em" since you said "people who
."- are in fact trolls who deserve what they get. First you know their secret intentions (making a career out of it) and second you deem them unworthy of having their content even remotely worth thinking about preserving before being pulled. You're tired, after all.
Please don't end up in a position of power, kind sir/ma'am.
- jayd16 8y agoHe's quoted in the article as saying his brand is politically incorrect. Its a calculated decision to add shock to his act. This conflict is not something he's trying to avoid to get his ideas out there. Its painfully clear. The content itself is irrelevant to my point as it is a general statement about adding shock value to any act and the faux-consequences of it.
- mancerayder 8y agoAnd my point is that there are people who conveniently "know" people's intentions as a way to silence, diminish or discredit them, like you're doing right now when you say things like "faux-consequences." Getting de-platformed (and losing revenue) are faux?