3 ms·
Let me set the record straight so you don’t have to guess about whether I’m conflating far left and center left: 1. I’m a moderate liberal by every measure. 2
by weberc2 8y ago
Let me set the record straight so you don’t have to guess about whether I’m conflating far left and center left:
1. I’m a moderate liberal by every measure.
2. I don’t view CNN as far left; while it is shamefully partisan, no more so than Fox News.
3. I don’t want the government to censor anyone, I’m more or less a free speech absolutist.
4. I don’t think tech companies in general are far-left; only that a handful appear to contain a sufficiently powerful contingent of far left ideologues who feel comfortable using their company to suppress dissent (social media platforms censoring moderate liberal and conservative viewpoints, Google firing Damore under patently false pretenses, Mozilla pushing out Eich, etc).
- xte 8y agoA small intervention: to my (western) European eyes saying that CNN is far left or even saying that far left exists in the USA is a fascist affirmation... That's to add a different "relative" measure. Apart of that far left and far right are essentially the SAME, their "lower labor force" are fanatic people used as a weapon/Ford models workers by the very same "sponsors" who want dictatorship instead of free society. If you read about or know someone who have visited both Franco's Spain and Chernenko's Soviet Union you will see that they are equally oppressive and use essentially the very same language, only with a little color variation in flags. Do not forget that Lenin was massively financed by Kaiser's Germany, Stalin by UK crown etc just to stop socialism transforming it in a dictatorial regime with same symbols, not different by the hitler financing by German élites against socialism in Germany, mussolini financed by UK crown against a socialist Italy etc. "left" is socialism, "center" is liberalism, the rest are only a grayscale of dictatorship movements disguised in various ways.
- weberc2 8y agoYes, these political descriptors have different meanings in the US compared to Europe.
- joshuamorton 8y agoThen why did you originally claim it was dominating universities, tech companies, and the newsroom? Those things are maybe left of center under some metrics, but not far left, and certainly not extremely far left, so why claim that? Again, if you're now going to claim that the people like Sargon and Milo and co being censored are moderate liberals, I'm gonna say that you're just patently incorrect, and your left-right scale is broken. That you equivocate fox and CNN only cements this. Compare morning Joe (one of the most partisan shows on CNN) to Hannity or Carlson, and there really isn't a comparison.
- weberc2 8y ago“The far left dominates universities, newsrooms, and tech companies” meant that these three categories of organizations are more likely to push a far left agenda. It doesn’t mean the organizations themselves are completely or even majority far-left. It also doesn’t mean every organization in the category behaves this way. It only means the power balance leans far left. As for why “far left” and not “moderate left”—because moderate leftists don’t have the authoritarian bent that we see from these organizations. They don’t seek to suppress moderate voices. I don’t know much about Sargon, but nothing on his wiki page seems to suggest he is far right, and I never claimed Milo was a moderate anything. You keep throwing out these straw men as though you’re desperate to have a very particular argument when it seems like you and I likely agree on quite a lot... RE Fox vs CNN, I don’t follow your point. They’re both patently moderate organizations; seems like you’re conflating partisanship with extremism and your sense of partisanship is based on two data points. In any case, I’m not interested in splitting hairs between Fox and CNN so long as we can agree that neither is extreme-anything (and if we can’t then you’re too far off the reservation to have a productive conversation with).
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]