3 ms·
>They all sound better, on average, than any Bluetooth No, they don't. They may sound better than cheap Bluetooth headsets. But I guarantee they don't sound
by mordant 8y ago
>They all sound better, on average, than any Bluetooth
No, they don't.
They may sound better than cheap Bluetooth headsets.
But I guarantee they don't sound better than my Nuraphones, or the Sennheiser Momentum 2 Wireless/HD-1s I was using beforehand.
Note that I own both Shure 535s and 846s, as well. The Nuraphone sounds better than either of them.
I use my Nuraphones for business con-calls every day. They sound great on my end and I've been told they sound great on the other end(s) of those calls, as well. Same with the Sennheisers.
- nouney 8y agoI guarantee bluetooth headsets suck, all of them.
- NikolaNovak 8y agoI'm not convinced (they may in ideal condition, but it does not appear that the Sennheisers or Nuraphones have a boom - they're just headphones with a microphone, so I'd be skeptical of their performance in a noisy environment or if you're typing on a keyboard or any other distracting audio input; as I said I love my wireless Sennheisers and Plantronics for listening, but there are times I still want 3.5mm option) , but for the sake of the argument, my question remains - how would _your_ experience be worse, if your phone also had a 3.5mm jack? (and lest we go down the argument of "what, do you still need a parallel port" etc - this is a standard that existed, depending on how you count, anywhere between 50 years and a century, which still performs the function cheaply, reliably and conveniently; whereas that lightning to 3.5mm to charging dongle will, if all goes well, be in the dustbins of history in 5-10 years or less - and we'll see how well the Bluetooth headsets work with audio devices 10 years from now)