>>So, which is it? Are you stupid or evil? Or maybe both? You're not going to get anywhere being so close-minded and prejudicial. >>you think that people actu

>>So, which is it? Are you stupid or evil? Or maybe both? You're not going to get anywhere being so close-minded and prejudicial. >>you think that people actually are capable of understanding the terms they are about to agree in any non-trivial case I think a court of law should decide whether a person provided informed consent to a contract. A jury, with time to deliberate on the specific circumstances of a case, and resorting to a large body of legal precedents that constitutes common law, is better positioned to issue a just decision than any other body that I can think of. I do not think these matters should be dealt with by populist legislation that makes blanket judgments about a huge number of diverse contracts between a diverse array of private individuals.