8 ms·
The article is reminiscent of propaganda pieces I recall reading in mid-80s in USSR newspapers about the supremacy of the communist system of governance. Not cl
by T3OU-736 8y ago
The article is reminiscent of propaganda pieces I recall reading in mid-80s in USSR newspapers about the supremacy of the communist system of governance. Not claiming that it is, in fact, propaganda, but the similarity is uncanny.
FWITW: I sincerely hope that China's EV industry rises to world level of engineering, safety, and all other things attendant to that. Preferably with with knowledge and expertise not borne from forced IP transfers and other shady/nefarious things. L
- baybal2 8y agoWell, the primary point - that he was not a party member, is barely relevant now. Xi has completely reversed all advances towards civil governance of Jiang-Hu period. It is best to say, that now that picture being presented to the reader is the future that China has lost with coming of Xi, the revisionist clique, and other back-from-the-dead political fossils.
- T3OU-736 8y agoHrmmm. Fair points. So, to make sure I understand you, you argue that the article is a "this could have been so much more/better/buckets-of-awesome if it wasn't for the stifling effects if the current ruling apparatus"? (I paraphrase woth the sole goal of to making sure I understood correctly)
- baybal2 8y agotrue
- ngcc_hk 8y agoAnd would it last
- baybal2 8y agoWho knows, unless somebody will forcefully push Xi and his groupies out of power, I don't see them losing power in any "natural" way. I also don't see anybody inside the party who simply have that type of character needed for political knife fighting. No such people left.