I don’t intend this to be a personal attack but I think you need to take a step back and re-evaluate what you’re saying because what I’m reading is that because

I don’t intend this to be a personal attack but I think you need to take a step back and re-evaluate what you’re saying because what I’m reading is that because of increasing populations, property is more valuable, which creates more opportunities for corners to be cut as land is developed; and then the solution to that problem is to ensure land doesn’t increase in value by implementing strict population controls by the state. I don’t even think immigration is a core element of your argument since logically you’d still want to limit the native population through some sort of dystopic state level program.