> It's a still. I'm referring to the video in the article. On 2:00 and 3:00 you can see the earth rising. When I first saw this photo years and years ago I in

> It's a still. I'm referring to the video in the article. On 2:00 and 3:00 you can see the earth rising. When I first saw this photo years and years ago I instinctively believed that the way we see the sun rise on earth due to the motion of the earth, the earth rose on the moon due to the motion of the moon (because the photo was titled "earthrise"). I learned later that the earth did not rise from the horizon like this, but wobbled in the sky. That's all. No need to change the title. But I still think it is misleading to call it "earthrise"