4 ms·
Kind of playing devil’s advocate here since there’s so many negative comments on this feature, but is it possible that this was a well-intentioned design decisi
by jointpdf 8y ago
Kind of playing devil’s advocate here since there’s so many negative comments on this feature, but is it possible that this was a well-intentioned design decision on the part of Netflix?
I personally like having the ability to preview content rapidly—I can glean a lot about a show/movie in just a few seconds of video (title/thumbnail alone is low-info). The old pattern was ~5 clicks + buffer time to watch a preview (if one was even available). Also, opening Netflix signals an intention to receive audio+video—this isn’t nearly so bad as e.g. ESPN’s site randomly blasting you with a video as I’m trying to read an article.
Anyways, I agree that software should be as user-configurable as is reasonable, and it seems that these days apps like Netflix are completely bereft of meaningful options. Also much of the content that Netflix pumps out feels like the output of a generative algorithm designed to cover market segments vs. anything guided by a sort of original artistic vision.
(PS—can we collectively pump the brakes on the “X minor annoyance is cancer” lingo?)
- usrusr 8y agoFor me there is definitely a bit of a "hype gap" for most shows on Netflix and those previews make it a bit smaller. A title and some random faces just don't get me interested in anything. I remember actually wishing for trailers on more than one occasion. But it's easy for me to not get upset about auto-playing trailers because my primary client never got updated to support them.