> There is plenty of evidence Such as? > but that's not the only kind of evidence of a historical figure, and lots of historical figures are accepted as such

> There is plenty of evidence Such as? > but that's not the only kind of evidence of a historical figure, and lots of historical figures are accepted as such without that form of evidence This argument has been debunked pretty well: https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/7924 https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/7924 > It is really strange and anti-academic to adopt a higher standard of proof for the existence of Jesus than other ancient figures. See above.