4 ms·
I do agree. A complete solution is designing a new generation/revision of time protocol with accountability and anti-misuse as parts of its design, just like ho
by bcaa7f3a8bbc 8y ago
I do agree. A complete solution is designing a new generation/revision of time protocol with accountability and anti-misuse as parts of its design, just like how people are implementing ASLR and NX in C programs and starting to use memory-safe languages. Or just see how TLSv1.3 removed all unsafe algorithms, so it will be little damage even under the worse case scenario.
Also, I think NTP needs more publicity. We need people to be aware of it before we could get feedback. The community then can have a watchdog team that spots misuses and publishes alerts.
- Animats 8y agodesigning a new generation/revision of time protocol with accountability and anti-misuse as parts of its design It would be "time.google.com" and you would need a Google account.
- bcaa7f3a8bbc 8y agoOr perhaps RoughTime when security is needed? https://roughtime.googlesource.com/roughtime https://roughtime.googlesource.com/roughtime
- rhizome 8y agoThere doesn't need to be a new revision when you can accomplish all those goals by running your own stratum 1: https://www.amazon.com/TimeMachines-TM1000A-maintains-broadcast-Satellites/dp/B002RC3Q4Q https://www.amazon.com/TimeMachines-TM1000A-maintains-broadc...
- classichasclass 8y agoI have one of these. They are super easy to set up and highly reliable. I can't recommend them enough.