Am I the only one who can't find a single argument for why he isn't biased in the whole article? He just goes: "Some people say I'm an offensive bad person, wh

Am I the only one who can't find a single argument for why he isn't biased in the whole article? He just goes: "Some people say I'm an offensive bad person, which is pushing a political and moral agenda, with my own biases, but I swear, I am pure facts and logic, and my reasoning is always neutral, and so I hope we can all move along and allow me to continue my logical rhetoric." I was hoping for some facts, counterfacts, examples, logical reasoning, I don't know, some more concrete demonstration of his good faith, neutrality, and display of unbiased methodology. Instead I just got a plea to believe his words. Did I miss something?