4 ms·
Clojure's stdlib is unintuitive, and `into` is the poster child. It's easy to find what's available in Ruby: https://ruby-doc.org/core-2.5.3/Enumerable.html ht
by anothergoogler 8y ago
Clojure's stdlib is unintuitive, and `into` is the poster child.
It's easy to find what's available in Ruby: https://ruby-doc.org/core-2.5.3/Enumerable.html https://ruby-doc.org/core-2.5.3/Enumerable.html
Good luck with Clojure: https://clojure.github.io/clojure/clojure.core-api.html https://clojure.github.io/clojure/clojure.core-api.html
- slifin 8y agohttps://re-find.it https://re-find.it ?
- anothergoogler 8y agoI'm talking about the flat namespace.
- gleenn 8y agoWhile I understand the sentiment that all the functions aren't necessarily grouped as in OO languages, I think the Clojure functions are harder to group because they're more general. That's not necessarily the strongest argument, but it is so much more obvious in OO because you always have the object to group by compared to functional languages.
- intertextuality 8y agohttps://clojuredocs.org/ https://clojuredocs.org/ is what I always used. I dislike ruby's docs actually. Rust and Crystal have better UX design for their docs.