3 ms·
Please don’t jump to conclusions, I have looked at the actual research and also read the books. None of the common cited evidence for Jesus as a historical figu
by owens99 8y ago
Please don’t jump to conclusions, I have looked at the actual research and also read the books. None of the common cited evidence for Jesus as a historical figure holds up to scrutiny. If you can give one example that can, it would help me a ton. I’d love to be wrong and understand Jesus as an actual historical figure.
- reitanqild 8y agoLate but this Quora answer has some details: https://www.quora.com/Did-any-of-the-Bibles-contributors-actually-meet-Jesus https://www.quora.com/Did-any-of-the-Bibles-contributors-act... I cannot verify it all right now, I'm more of a practical guy when it comes to Christinanity, but a few of the writers from the new testament were followers, and two (?) were his step (if you belive in it like me) brothers. For a common bloke from 2000 years ago multiple written sources from people who met him first hand should count as pretty well documented. I'm not saying you should believe everything they wrote (although I do) I'm just pointing out that the basic facts are very well documented given the circumstances.