> This word "wait" is particularly problematic. You can't know a priori that the attacker will be a nominee for the Supreme Court, so you can't really wait to a

> This word "wait" is particularly problematic. You can't know a priori that the attacker will be a nominee for the Supreme Court, so you can't really wait to accuse them on that basis. Great analysis of (the absurdity of) that poll question. I was just commenting that it is possible for a question to be biased, so to I really appreciate this detailed breakdown of it, particularly of that seemingly innocuous word "wait".