3 ms·
> Furthermore, without types, we obscure the fact that setters and getters are unified. This is way beyond what most people need to know to benefit from lens t
by whateveracct 8y ago
> Furthermore, without types, we obscure the fact that setters and getters are unified.
This is way beyond what most people need to know to benefit from lens though.
Haskell itself has a counterexample: aeson-lens. It gives you lenses and prisms for working with JSON ASTs. Any unityped language could benefit from lenses for their unityped structures (JS and Clojure come to mind.)