I’m really struggling to see the difference between your description of 4th wave feminism, and the author’s more succinct summation. I’m also struggling to see

I’m really struggling to see the difference between your description of 4th wave feminism, and the author’s more succinct summation. I’m also struggling to see how what seems to be bikeshedding around some fairly innocuous semantics which don’t particularly change the point of the article, leads to your conclusion of the article being an incoherent mess. The majority of what’s being held up as problematic is very much a matter of approach rather than goals, while you seem to be hung up on goals. Or maybe I’m missing something? He doesn’t seem to be anything other than supportive of fighting for the aims you’re discussing, he’s questioning the degree to which moral posturing online along with crude mobs really serves those goals in the long run. I guess it feels like you e cherrypicked a strange and minimal assortment of content to analyze, and it doesn’t seem like it supports your extremely harsh conclusions.