Since 80:20 also match the top 20% income distribution for men, it seems like there is something missing from this idea that it is the pictures that are the pro

Since 80:20 also match the top 20% income distribution for men, it seems like there is something missing from this idea that it is the pictures that are the problem. If we want a system that breaks the 80:20 models, I would expect a better result by even out the social economical status signals. Make everyone appear identical on classical identified selection metrics and maybe people get less restrictive in the process.