That's the biggest issue here because I don't think they ever showed that the songs were downloaded from her computer. The RIAA used the make available argument

That's the biggest issue here because I don't think they ever showed that the songs were downloaded from her computer. The RIAA used the make available argument which makes no sense to me. Frankly, this whole case has nothing to do with Thomas being a good person or an evil person stealing music, rational or irrational. The real question is why 1.5 million was awarded for something that's orders of magnitude less in damages. It's ridiculous.