I'm a fan of Bart Ehrman, but I think Richard Carrier's arguments on the Historicity of Jesus are superior. He also goes through the effort to quantitatively ev

I'm a fan of Bart Ehrman, but I think Richard Carrier's arguments on the Historicity of Jesus are superior. He also goes through the effort to quantitatively evaluate the evidence for and against, giving only a 1/3 probability that there was a historical Jesus.