5 ms·
Link to the actual legislation: https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/6227 https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/6227 So, w
by jMyles 8y ago
Link to the actual legislation: https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/6227 https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/6227
So, whoa - I hadn't even heard of this. Had y'all?
$1.2B on an exotic tech field - with implications that bigly threaten online privacy and security - seems like an incredible thing to get through both houses and signed into law without it being a story in these parts.
Amash unsurprisingly voted no (joining only 10 others in the house, while 348 voted aye). A quick perusal of his twitter doesn't show me any of his thoughts on it. I'd like to hear them.
- onetimemanytime 8y ago>>$1.2B on an exotic tech field - with implications that bigly threaten online privacy and security Probably more than that...even regular computer threaten privacy and security, in 0.2 seconds they scan all faces or fingerprints in the world. Congress probably doesn't want USA to be left behind.
- meritt 8y agoThere was a bit of discussion back when this bill was introduced: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17524928 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17524928
- deathhand 8y agoIt is always an arms race. India now allows the government to decrypt personal data: https://www.zdnet.com/article/india-authorizes-10-agencies-to-intercept-monitor-and-decrypt-citizens-data/ https://www.zdnet.com/article/india-authorizes-10-agencies-t... If anything it should tell us that Crypto works(for us whose math skills may not be up to the task) and there are not as many backdoors as technologies in the past.
- dcposch 8y agoFortunately, post quantum crypto is pretty far along-- meaning cryptographic primitives that cannot be broken by quantum computing. The cryptography challenge has seen huge progress; a surprising amount of it from one guy, DJB, an absolute legend. What remains is a hard software engineering and standardization challenge: upgrading our apps and protocols to use quantum secure crypto. https://pqcrypto.org https://pqcrypto.org
- wbl 8y agoThere have been a considerable number of other people involved: the complete list of people in the NIST post-quantum submission teams is pretty big.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- jchw 8y ago>with implications that bigly threaten online privacy and security Well, it never hurts to start researching post-quantum crypto even if large quantum computers were to prove impractical. I recall Google ran an experiment with a post-quantum key exchange algorithm [1], though I have no clue what came of said experiment. [1] https://security.googleblog.com/2016/07/experimenting-with-post-quantum.html?m=1 https://security.googleblog.com/2016/07/experimenting-with-p...
- mapmeld 8y agoThis is ongoing, and Microsoft and Google continued browser experiments with another algorithm (paper titled "Frodo: Take off the ring! Practical, Quantum-Secure Key Exchange from LWE") https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/659 https://eprint.iacr.org/2016/659 - you can also see a recent video from DEF CON https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCdaYAFx7hw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCdaYAFx7hw In both cases, they are using a type of lattice-based cryptography known as LWE (learning with errors).
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]